It is now just about three years since the IHF, the IEEE, and the EIA adopted
new standards for the uniform measurement of FM tuner performance. The new
standard (given IHF number IHF-T-200, 1975 and IEEE Standard Number 185-1975),
issued on May 19, 1975, represented a much-needed updating of FM measurement
techniques. (IHF-T-200, 1975 may be obtained from the Institute of High Fidelity,
489 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017 at a cost of $5.00.) The previous standard
available from the IHF had been promulgated way back in 1958 (before the days
of stereo FM), while the old IEEE standard was even older, having been last
issued in 1947 when FM was still in its infancy as far as public acceptance
was concerned.
Most manufacturers of FM tuners and receivers have adopted some of the measurement
and reporting techniques spelled out in the new standard.
Very few manufacturers have actually published every specification called
for in the new standard. A few manufacturers continue to ignore the new standard
entirely, and what few specifications they do publish are still based upon
earlier standards. Table 3 of the new standard is reproduced here as a partial
explanation of why many manufacturers don't bother to detail all of the specifications
of an FM tuner in their advertising and promotional brochures. No less than
22 separate published specifications are called for in the case of monophonic
performance, while an additional 11 specifications are called for in the
case of stereophonic performance. Several of these specifications require
multiple listings (e.g., distortion at 65 dBf actually calls for readings
at three modulating frequencies in mono and the same three frequencies must
be used and listed for stereo distortion figures), making the list of required
specifications even longer. In the case of the IHF (which is concerned primarily
with manufacturers whose tuner products might properly be called "high
fidelity" equipment), that trade association does not have any legal
means to force even its members to embrace the new standard. The IHF can
only suggest to and encourage its members to abide by the new standards.
The choice of specifications which members of the IHF (and others) have made
tells us much about the nature and usefulness of many of the new specifications
and measurements.
Usable Sensitivity
Although much has been written about the relative unimportance of this specification,
most manufacturers continue to "feature" it as the specification
of primary importance at least as far as monophonic performance of the FM
tuner is concerned. What's more, public awareness of "microvolt" notations
of signal strength prompts many to continue to list usable sensitivity in
that form, rather than to use the new and more meaningful "dBf" power
notation for signal strength. Many continue to quote sensitivity in both
forms. A simple formula for conversion from microvolts to dBf (assuming a
300-ohm antenna input impedance) is: dBf = 20log,oµV/0.55.
Not surprisingly, very few manufacturers tell us the value of "usable
sensitivity" for stereo operation of their products (though these days,
most FM listening is in the stereo mode). There are at least two reasons
for this deliberate omission. Most FM tuners have automatic switching from
mono to stereo. The switchover point is usually set by the manufacturer so
that when a signal is strong enough to cause the transition from mono to
stereo operation, the noise and distortion will be well under 3 percent (or
more than 30 dB below the desired output signal level). If a manufacturer
sets the switching threshold to, say, 5µV (19.2 dBf), that becomes, per torce,
the "stereo usable sensitivity." On the printed spec sheet, such
a number is not terribly impressive when compared with the 1.8, 1.7, or 1.6
microvolts figures (10.3, 9.8, or 9.3 dBf) normally associated with mono
usable sensitivity of modern tuners.
Even where auto switching from mono to stereo is not featured, one can expect
the stereo usable-sensitivity figure to be poorer than that of the mono usable
sensitivity, and manufacturers are understandably reluctant to disclose this
seeming disparity.
50-dB Quieting
The most important specification appearing in the new standard calls for
a statement of signal strength required in mono and stereo for the noise
to be suppressed 50 dB compared with the 100 percent modulated output signal
at 1 kHz. Manufacturers have seemed more willing to publish these figures.
Readers of specification sheets should not be disappointed to find that
at least 20 dB more of input signal is required to reach this "listenable" noise
level in stereo than is required in mono. Thus, a tuner claiming a 50-dB
quieting requirement of 12.0 dBf in mono (2.2 µV), will, at its best, require
32.0 dBf (22.0 µV) of input signal to achieve the same degree of quieting
in stereo. Design limitations usually result in even greater discrepancies
between these two published figures.
Above: Table 3--Receiver Performance Evaluation
Fig. 1-Mono and stereo quieting in the FM section.
Fig. 2-Mono and stereo distortion characteristics in the FM section.
Fig. 3-Ideal frequency response of an FM tuner follows the 75-µS de-emphasis
to beyond 15 kHz with a sharp notch in response at 19 kHz.
Fig. 4-In a less-than-ideal response curve the kHz filter action interacts
with the 75-µS de emphasis curve above 10 kHz.
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
In the case of this specification too, manufacturers have generally complied
with the new standard and offered S/N values (in dB) for both mono and stereo
performance. By the time a strong signal (65 dBf) is applied to the antenna
terminals of most tuners, the difference in quieting between mono and stereo
operation has usually reached a much lower figure. Typically, a tuner having
a 70-dB S/N ratio in mono may exhibit quieting of 65 dB or even more in the
stereo mode. Figure 1 shows the manner in which the stereo and mono quieting
curves tend to converge as signal strength increases.
Distortion at 50-dB Quieting
One seldom sees this value published at all and, in my opinion at least,
this is one specification which the standards committees responsible for
the new standard might have been better off omitting and Fig. 2 shows why.
Note that in Fig. 1, 50 dB of quieting in mono was reached with an input
signal level of 12.0dBf (2.2 µV). As we can see in Fig. 2, at that signal
level, distortion is still quite high (1.0 percent in our example). The combination
of incomplete limiting and minimal AGC levels restricts i.f. bandwidth and
detector linearity so that 100 percent modulation at such low signal levels
is "pushed" beyond the linear operating range of the i.f. detector
circuitry of the tuner. Thus, the better the 50-dB quieting of the tuner
in mono, the "poorer" the 50-dB quieting distortion is likely to
be. Adding further to this contradiction is the fact that since a greater
signal input is required to attain 50-dB quieting in stereo, the 50-dB quieting
distortion in the stereo mode nearly always turns out to be lower than in
the mono mode-a contradiction not easily understood by the average consumer.
Frequency Response
One would think that designers would have no difficulty in maintaining near-perfect
frequency response in an FM tuner from 30 to 15,000 Hz (the legal limits
of audio modulation in FM). Yet, as is easily seen from the many published
tuner spec sheets, it is not unusual to find claimed response varying by
±1.0 dB, ±1.5 dB, or even worse. Again, two conflicting factors are at work
here. Ideally, the response of the tuner to 19 kHz should be minimal in order
to suppress any 19 kHz, stereo-pilot signal output from the tuner. Substantial
output at this frequency can have an undesired effect when FM programs are
recorded onto tape decks equipped with Dolby circuitry (the Dolby decoder
senses this signal as a high frequency audio "program" signal causing
false Dolby encoding) and can, in some cases, actually be injurious to tweeters.
In still other instances, 19 kHz (and harmonic products of that pilot frequency)
can cause audible "beats" when recorded on tape.
But rejection of this unwanted output requires a carefully designed 19 kHz,
notch-filter circuit in series with the output signals. Unless that filter
is of a multi-pole (and thus expensive) design, it is likely to start "rolling
off" desired response in
the range from 10 kHz and upwards. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate this problem.
Response of an "ideal" filter is illustrated in Fig. 3, while the
less-than-ideal situation (typically found in many tuners and receivers)
is shown in Fig. 4.
Intermodulation Distortion
Most experts agree that the inter modulation distortion tests specified
in the new standards tell more about the audible performance of a tuner than
the harmonic distortion tests. Yet, virtually no tuner or receiver manufacturer
bothers to specify this important number. Here, I think, the reasons arise
more from practical considerations than from any attempt to withhold information.
The IM tests require the use of two signals of equal amplitude (14 kHz and
15 kHz) with an instantaneous peak deviation of ±75 kHz. The resulting 1000-Hz
IM product at the output must be measured using a 200 Hz-to-1500-Hz bandpass
filter and expressed as a percentage of the output that would be obtained
when 1000-Hz modulation at ±75 kHz is used. The test set-up is illustrated
in Fig. 5. Unfortunately, none of the popular FM signal generators currently
used by most manufacturers have this built-in test signal available, and
the required bandpass filter is not standard either.
Thus, it would seem that manufacturers have simply been too lazy to build
their own test fixtures for this important test. (That applies to this equipment
reviewer as well, though I have, many times, vowed to correct that omission!)
============
Table 1 -- FM Tuner Specification Priorities.
Order Of Priority From 0 to 15
Notes: These are the priorities author Len Feldman feels should be assigned
to FM tuner specifications. Note that in many instances, a specification
that is important for close-in dwellers is of lesser importance to fringe-area
inhabitants.
*Figures must be provided for both mono and stereo reception.
**Of lesser importance in stereo, since tuner is well beyond full limiting
and wide bandwidth reception at 50-dB quieting.
***Only of concern if you plan to record onto tape from FM.
****Only of concern if stations in your area transmit SCA signals.
============
Unchanged Specifications
The following specifications and their methods of measurement remain substantially
the same as they were in earlier tuner measurement standards Alternate channel
selectivity, spurious response ratio, capture ratio, i.f, response ratio,
image response ratio, and AM suppression ratio. Not surprisingly, most manufacturers
find no difficulty in fully disclosing these specs.
On the other hand, adjacent channel selectivity, though clearly called for
in the new standards, is almost never published by tuner or receiver manufacturers.
Again, the manufacturer is faced with conflicting requirements here. If the
tuner is designed with an extremely wide i.f. bandwidth in order to provide
ultra-low distortion performance, the adjacent channel selectivity (and sometimes
even the alternate channel selectivity) is going to be a relatively low number.
After all, the tests for adjacent channel selectivity involve measuring the
response of the tuner to a signal that is only 200 kHz removed from a desired
signal. In an ultra-low distortion tuner, the adjacent channel selectivity
figure may be as low as from 5 dB to 20 dB or so! Most manufacturers probably
conclude that the audio consumer, having been conditioned to expect high "selectivity" figures,
will be discouraged by such "low" selectivity values and will fail
to understand the difference between adjacent and alternate channel selectivity.
This is especially so since, for years, manufacturers have listed this specification
as, simply, "selectivity"-without specifying the fact that it was
measured for a signal that is 400 kHz (two channels away) from the desired
signal.
As many readers are probably aware, a trend that has developed recently
is to offer tuners with variable (or two degrees) of selectivity. "Narrow" settings
are used when stations are close together on the dial (at the expense of
ultra-low distortion), while "wide" settings are used when signal
frequencies are far enough apart on the dial so that the lower selectivity
afforded by such i.f. circuit configurations does not cause interference
problems and yields the lowest distortion figures possible.
Subcarrier Product Ratio and SCA Rejection Ratio
These specifications and the methods used to measure them are two which
relate to the stereo performance of tuners and receivers. We have already
discussed subcarrier product rejection and how it is interrelated with a
tuner's frequency response. Quite a few manufacturers are quoting this figure
correctly and accurately.
Fig. 5-Setup required for measuring the IM distortion of an FM tuner.
Fig. 6-Suggested method of creating modulated 67kHz sub-carrier for proper
measurement of SCA rejection.
As for SCA rejection ratio, I am certain that just about every dedicated
FM listener has, at some time or other, been subjected to mysterious swishing
and gurgling noises when listening to certain FM stations. As most readers
know, many FM stations earn additional revenues by leasing their sub carrier
facilities to such private communications firms as background music operators,
private news services, and special services such as talking books for the
blind. In the case of stereo FM stations, this service is transmitted via
a 67-kHz subcarrier which is frequency modulated by the subscriber audio
information. In theory, at least, regular listeners to FM should not hear
any of this audio material, and special sets are leased to subscribers who
are entitled to this SCA service. The gurgling and swishing sounds referred
to are the result of cross modulation and intermodulation effects taking
place either at the transmitter or (more likely) at the tuner.
I have often found, when listening to and bench testing certain FM tuners
and receivers, that the published specification regarding SCA rejection does
not provide reliable correlation with what I hear when tuning to a station
which is known to be transmitting an SCA signal. I suspect that the reason
why the audible effects of SCA interference are greater than might be expected
from the published specs is very likely that manufacturers, in testing for
SCA rejection, are merely applying a fixed 67-kHz modulating signal to their
FM generators at an appropriate modulation level of 10 percent and measuring
the resultant output at the audio output terminals of the tuner or receiver.
That sort of static test will yield impressively high rejection figures for
almost any decent tuner.
Unfortunately, that type of test does not correspond with what actually
takes place when a transmitter sends out an SCA sub-carrier signal. A careful
reading of the new standard discloses that the 67-kHz sub-carrier signal
used must in turn be frequency modulated by a 2.5-kHz sine wave to an extent
of ±6 kHz. In other words, the 67-kHz carrier is made to vary from 61 kHz
to 73 kHz at a 2.5-kHz rate. It is this modulation of the 67-kHz sub carrier
which causes the audible interference to a stereo listener, rather than the
presence of the 67-kHz carrier itself as part of the recovered signal complex.
While several FM signal generators (including the popular Sound Technology
Model 1000A) do have a built-in 67-kHz signal capable of modulating the main
carrier, these generators have no direct provision for frequency modulating
that carrier, and so many manufacturers do not bother to construct or purchase
the necessary equipment to make the test properly.
In my own lab, I have worked out a simple way in which to create this FM
modulated 67-kHz sub-carrier. Since I own two FM signal generators anyway
(two are required for such measurements as selectivity and capture ratio)
as well as a "univerter" (which is normally used to create an
i.f. signal at 10.7 MHz for measuring i.f. rejection), I found that I could
create a "beat frequency" of 67 kHz between one of my signal generators
and the univerter (in much the same way that a beat of 10.7 MHz is created
using these two pieces of equipment). By then modulating the generator of
this combination with a 2.5-kHz signal and with a deviation of ±6 kHz, out
comes a modulated 67 kHz carrier which can then be used to modulate the main
carrier of my second generator. The test setup is shown in the diagram of
Fig. 6. Both the univerter and the generator associated with it must be fully
stabilized and free of drift in order to maintain a constant 67-kHz beat
frequency sub-carrier using this method, and I use a frequency counter to
insure against possible drift of the critical 67-kHz frequency while making
the SCA rejection measurement.
Summary
Much has been written lately about the lack of correlation between
bench measurements made on modern amplifiers and their ultimate listenability.
Indeed, I agree that there are probably many static measurements which
we have not learned to make on an amplifier which would enable us to obtain
a more meaningful set of test data if we but knew what those measurements
might be.
In the case of FM tuner performance, however, I believe that the new standards
do offer a comprehensive picture of the merits (or demerits) of a tuner or
receiver insofar as its FM performance capability is concerned. A statement
of all (or at least nearly all) of the specifications which the standard
recommends be published can help the consumer who wants to purchase a superior
FM tuner or receiver to make a proper judgment. Now it's up to more manufacturers
to take the trouble to use the new standard for all it's worth.
(Source: Audio magazine, Apr. 1978; Leonard Feldman)
= = = =
|