The Parasound Zamp V.3 Zone Amplifier is part of the extremely compact second-
and third-generation Zcustom product line: Z because they are often used for
multiple zones; custom because their diminutive size solves space problems
in custom installations. The review unit is an earlier version of the Ztuner
in the Parasound TDQ 1501.
All Zcustom model front pan el heights and mounting holes conform to the
ETA standard for single space rack mounting. Zcustom panels are half rack
width so that you can mount two Zcustom models in a single rack space when
their front panels are attached. If you mount only one Zcustom model in a
rack, it will require a Zblank SBS (side by-side) panel to span the full 19”
rack width. There is not much finger space under the unit when it is placed
on a flat surface, but its light weight makes it easy to lift and carry.
The Zamp was furnished with a 16- gauge removable power cord, a 2.5mm- 2.5mm
trigger cable, and a 2.5mm-3.5mm trigger adapter cable. The 10- page Owner’s
Guide provides all the basics and specifications. The review unit was made
in Taiwan.
Parasound
950 Battery Street, San Francisco, CA 94111
MSRP: $300 US
Dimensions: 9.5’ W x 10’D x 2” H
Net Weight: 6.65 lbs. 3 kg.
Warranty: 10 years parts, 5 years labor
PHOTO 1 (top): Front view.
PHOTO 2 (bottom): Rear panel.
INSIDE THE AMPLIFIER
The Parasound Zamp V.3 Zone Amplifier is a fully discrete stereo power amplifier
rated at 45W per channel 8-ohm in stereo mode (60W pc 4-ohm) or it can be
bridged to provide over 90W mono into 8-ohm. Photo 1 shows the front panel.
The power button is on the left, followed by a 1/8” (3.5mm) stereo headphone
jack. The display window in the center has four indicators. The red Protect
indicator, which lights when the protection circuit activates, flashes for
2 seconds after the unit is first turned on. The L and R Channel indicators
show green when the amplifier is operating normally, and will go out when
the channel is faulted or an over-temperature exists. Finally, the Hi-Temp
indicator turns red at or above the maximum safe operating temperature. The
unit will shut down and remain off until it has cooled sufficiently.
The amplifier is composed of the usual three-sided steel sheet metal chassis
and cover. Six screws hold the cover to the chassis, and it also engages a
slot in the rear of the faceplate. This aluminum faceplate varies from 4 -
5mm thick, and the four rack mounting slots are an integral part of it. The
top, bottom, and both sides have slots to enhance cooling. Four ¼” thick plastic
mounting feet have an elastomer ring on the bottom to help absorb vibration
when you place the unit on a flat surface. You can configure the power transformer
primary for 115V or 230V mains by means of a slide switch mounted flush to
the bottom of the unit.
The rear panel (Photo 2) beginning on the left side has two pairs of gold-
plated RCA input jacks that are looped together. Next comes a mini-control
panel with three switches and three small pots. The switches are the Mono-
Stereo switch (mono mode uses the right input jack); a Ground Lift switch;
and the Auto On switch. The latter has three positions: Audio Sense, in which
the Zamp will power up automatically when an audio signal is present. This
uses the control pot on the right side to adjust the sensitivity to an audio
signal, the Main position that uses the front panel power switch, and the
12V position that responds to the 9-12V 15mA Trigger in-out jacks. The two
pots on the left side are for L and R input level control, which the Zamp
has in common with my Parasound HCA-1000A.
Two pairs of high-quality gold-plated five-way speaker binding posts are
mounted on an angle to accommodate the compact chassis height. These pairs
of binding posts are on US 0.75” centers so dual banana plugs can be used
in stereo mode. However, the two red posts are spaced farther apart, so a
dual banana plug cannot be used in bridged mono mode. The input jack and speaker
terminal grounds are not connected together.
The IEC power receptacle has an integral 3A fuse, and its third ground pin
is not connected to the chassis, thus the Ground Lift switch needs further
explanation. This switch is normally left in the Gnd position. The manual
ex plains that if you hear excessive back ground hum, try setting the switch
to the Lift position, which disconnects the audio circuitry from chassis ground.
The AC line side of the transformer remains connected to the chassis through
a high value resistor.
Photo 3 shows the amplifier with the cover removed. You can see that the
four input jacks, with their gold-plated ground shells, have nickel-plated
center contacts.
A large Wei Kang toroidal transformer provides power for the Zamp. The protection
relay board is located to the left of the toroid in the photo, and also carries
the full-wave bridge rectifier on the underside.
The two small boards on the upper right behind the front panel are for the
headphone jack and the power switch. Two 220-ohm power resistors deliver the
amplifier output signals to the head phone jack. A small connector with wires
running to the rear of the unit appears to deliver the audio signal to the
audio sense circuit on the control switch board at the lower right in the
picture, near the input jacks. The hole in this PC board allows access to
a bias adjust pot on the main board.
The finless aluminum heatsink sits vertically at the center of the amplifier.
The main PC board is a single-sided FR4 board with solder mask. A number of
wire jumpers are used to interconnect circuit tracks. Conventional-grade metal
film resistors and polypropylene film caps are used in the audio path. Air-core
inductors and RC zobel networks are used between the output transistors and
the binding posts.
The four status indicators are located on a vertical PC board just behind
the display window.
TOPOLOGY
A schematic was not furnished with the unit. John Curl told me that he was
not involved in the design of the ZCustom series of components. The lack of
JFETs in the front end of the amplifier is one of the telling differences
between the Zamp and my JC-designed HCA 1000A.
The heatsink mounted output devices for each channel are Sanyo 25D1074 NPN
and 2SB817 PNP bipolar power transistors. I find it a bit unusual to see 2SB/2SD
devices ( 15MHz) in the output stage, rather than the more usual 2SA/2SC devices
( 40- 50MHz). However, like the Parasound HCA-1000A, the driver transistors
are 2SA1358 and 25C3421. Bipolar TO-92 transistors are used in the front end,
with a heatsink mounted 2SD669A Vbe multiplier. The thermal protection sensor
is located in the center of the heat- sink. The main reservoir capacitors
are 4700uF Jamicons, two per channel.
The main PC board also uses three dual op amps: a JRC4558 appears to be part
of the audio sense circuit used for auto turn-on. There are also one JRC072
and one JRC2072. One is probably used for the DC servo functions, and the
other the inverter for bridged mode operation. Two power transistors provide
the regulated DC rails for the opamps. The small control switchboard has one
16-pin digital logic chip and a few discretes.
MEASUREMENTS
I operated the Zamp V.3 amplifier at 10W into 8-ohm at 1kHz to properly condition
it for testing. About ten minutes into the run the amplifier tripped on high
temperature protection. The chassis temperature just above the heatsink had
increased to 46° C. The amplifier reset automatically in about three minutes.
After another five minutes it tripped again.
At one-third power (15W into 8-ohm) the chassis above the heatsink reached
a maxi mum temperature of 47° C in eight minutes, when the high temperature
protection tripped yet again. I reduced the output power to 5W, and the amp
ran fine for the remainder of the hour without further high temperature trips.
Perhaps the compact Zamp requires the frame of an equipment rack for additional
conduction cooling.
The THD reading at the end of this 5W run-in period was 0.0054% in both the
left and right channels. Accordingly, the distortion measurements for the
left channel are presented here. There is a low thump when starting up and
silence when shutting down the amplifier.
Output hum and noise measured 0.12mV (—87dBr, input shorted) and was inaudible
with my ear against the speaker. I also measured a worst-case —2.3mV of DC
offset (left channel). The Gnd Lift switch position made no difference in
any of the readings.
The Zamp V.3 preserves normal polarity. Input impedance measured about 20k,
much lower than the 33k specified, and did not vary with the level control
settings. The left input is shorted when in mono (bridged) mode. The gain
at 2.83V RMS output into 4 ohm and 8 ohm loads was approximately 22dBv over
the entire audio frequency range. The out put impedance at 1kHz was 0.11 ohm,
in creasing to 0.31-ohm at 20kHz. In bridged mono mode the output impedances
were 0.16 ohm and 0.38 ohm.
FREQUENCIES
The frequency response (Fig. 1) was within —1dB from DC to 37kHz, at an output
of 2.83V RMS at 1kHz into 8-ohm. It was down —3dB at 72kHz. There is a bit
of a lift at low frequencies, while the high frequencies start to fall off
before 20kHz. The response with a complex load of 8 ohm paralleled with a
2 cap (a test of compatibility with electrostatic speakers) produced a frequency
peak of +3.4dB at 43kHz (upper dashed line).
PHOTO 3: Interior.
The amplifier was relatively insensitive to the impedance variations of my
speaker load, an NHT SuperOne (dashed line between 4 ohm and 8 ohm). When
I shut down the unit and switched to bridged mono mode, the gain was 10dBv
higher than in stereo mode into 8 ohm with the same level of input signal.
In Fig. 1, I normalized the bridged mode level at 1kHz to +2dB to keep it
within the graph.
At low frequencies the noise floor limited the cross talk performance. The
right to left channel wideband crosstalk was slightly better than that of
the left to right (Table 1). Adding an A-weighting filter altered the 10kHz
performance by just THD+N versus frequency is in Fig. 2 for the loads indicated
graph. During distortion testing, I engaged the test set 80kHz low-pass filter
to limit the out-of-band noise. The dashed wiggle at low frequencies with
the speaker load is due to the varying impedance with frequency. The dashed
wiggle at the high frequency end is due to the complex load of 8(1 in parallel
with 2 The bridged mono load for this test was 10W into 8-ohm.
TABLE 1:
FIGURE 1: Frequency response.
FIGURE 2: THD+N vs. frequency.
FIGURE 3: THD+N vs. output power.
FIGURE 4: Distortion residual, 1kHz 5W 80.
FIGURE 5: Distortion residual, bridged mode, 1kHz 10W 80.
FIGURE 6: Spectrum of 50Hz sine wave, 5W 80.
Figure 3 shows THD+N versus out put power for the loads and frequencies shown
in the graph. The IHF “speaker” load is shown as a dashed line. The amplifier,
with both channels driven, reached its 1% clipping point at 43.4W with the
8(1 load (for —0.16dBW of headroom) and 55W with the 4(1 load (—0.38dBW).
The negative half-cycles clipped just slightly before the positive half-cycles,
with a scoop-out at the negative peak.
The headroom shortfall from the rated output at 8(1 was even greater at 20Hz
(39.4W or —0.58dBW) and 20kHz (42.9W or —0.21dBW). The Zamp did reach rated
output between 2% and 3% THD, however. With the unit connected to 8(1 in bridged
mono mode, the 1% THD level at 1kHz was 98.9W, producing a power output head
room of +0.41dBW. At this power level the 120Hz power supply rectifier pulses
slightly modulated the peaks of the 1kHz sine wave.
The distortion residual waveform for 5W into 8-ohm at 1kHz is shown in Fig.
4. The upper waveform is the amplifier output signal, and the lower waveform
is the monitor output (after the THD test set notch filter), not to scale.
The residual signal shows mainly noise, but with spikes at each zero crossing.
THD+N at this test point is a low 0.0049%. Figure 5 shows the residual 1kHz
waveform in bridged mono mode with a 10W load into 8-ohm. Here the THD+N is
0.042%.
The spectrum of a 50Hz sine wave at 5W into 8 is shown in Fig. 6, from zero
to 1.3kHz. The THD+N here measures 0.0052%. The 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th harmonics
lie at —86dB, —96dB, —100dB, and —95dB, respectively. The calculated THD for
these harmonics is also 0.0052%. Low-level power sup ply artifacts are also
present at 60Hz, 120Hz, and 180Hz. More curious is the distribution of mostly
100Hz-spaced spikes at —100dB across the spectrum. The spectrum of a 50Hz
sine wave at 10W in bridged mono had a similar distribution of harmonics and
spikes, but at higher levels (Fig. 7). The THD+N reading here is 0.043%.
I also recorded the spectrum of a 1kHz sine wave at 5W into 8-ohm (Fig. 8).
The THD+N measures 0.0054%, with the 2nd-5th harmonics at —95dB, —86dB,—95dB,
and —91dB. This calculates to 0.0035% THD. As with the 50Hz spectrum, there
is a pattern kHz of spikes across the 20 display at or near —100dB. I wonder
whether these are related to the crossover distortion I observed in the residual
distortion. The spectrum of 1kHz into the speaker load (Fig. 9) produced a
rather large spike at about 1.5kHz, which I cannot explain. The measured THD+N
is 0.0046%.
FIGURE 7: Spectrum of 50Hz sine wave, bridged mode, 10W, 8-ohm.
FIGURE 8: Spectrum of 1kHz sine wave, 5W 8-ohm.
FIGURE 9: Spectrum of 1kHz sine wave, 5W speaker load.
FIGURE 10: Spectrum of CCIF MD signal, 1Vp—p 8 ohm.
FIGURE 11: Spectrum of CCIF IMD signal, bridged mode, 12Vp-p 8 ohm.
FIGURE 12: Spectrum of multitone IMD signal, 12Vp—p, 8 ohm.
Figure 10 shows the amplifier output spectrum reproducing a combined 19kHz
+ 20kHz CCIF intermodulation distortion (IMD) signal at l2Vpp into 8ft The
1kHz IMD product is —95dB (0.0018%), and the 18kHz product is —91dB. As with
the sine wave spectrums, there are groups of spikes at or below —100dB. In
bridged mode (Fig. 11) the CCTF spectrum is similar, but with higher levels
of IM products.
I repeated the IMD test with a multi-tone signal (9kHz + 10.05kHz + 20kHz,
Fig. 12), which gives a better indication of the amplifier’s nonlinear response,
because it is a closer approximation to music than a sine wave. The MIM spectrum
is equally busy.
FIGURE 13: Squarewave 50Hz, 2.5Vp—p 8 ohm.
FIGURE 14: Squarewave 1kHz, 2.5Vp—p 8 ohm.
FIGURE 15: Squarewave 10kHz, 2.5Vp-p 8 ohm.
FIGURE 16: Squarewave 10kHz, 2.5Vp—p 8 ohm/2pF.
The 2.5Vp-p square-waves of 40Hz and 1kHz into 8-ohm (Figs. 13 and 14) were
al most perfect. The leading edge of the 10kHz squarewave in Fig. 15 is noticeably
rounded, indicative of the early HF response rolloff. When I connected 2uF
in parallel with the 8-ohm load in Fig. 16, there was noticeable ringing,
which collaborates with the frequency peaking in Fig. 1.
A comparison of the measured results and the manufacturer’s ratings is shown
in Table 2.
Manufacturer’s Response:
1: In the discussion about the temperature protection tripping with higher-level
test signals, this seems at odds with the subjective review’s frequent comments
about the amp running cool. Perhaps there should be a comment in the objective
section about the temperatures when playing real program materials instead
of test signals.
I’m sure readers will understand this, but someone viewing a reprint might
not be all that sophisticated about audio and electronics.—Gordon Sell, PR
for Parasound.
2: It’s true the amp will get warm with high power sine wave testing, owing
to the heat dissipation limitations of such a small chassis (and the fact
that is fully occupied with parts). But it won’t over heat with music under
99% of the applications in which it’s used.
By the way, with a Zbreeze stacked on it running silently (actually about
27dB), on its lowest speed the Zamp v.3 will output its full rated 4 ohm power
24/7 without a wimper—Richard Schram, Parasound.
TABLE 2: MEASURED PERFORMANCE.
= = = = = =
Parasound Zamp V.3 Amplifier
LISTENING CRITIQUE
We first played the Parasound Zamp on Cohn’s computer-based sound system.
A few days later when we tried to get the Zamp back, we realized we’d goofed.
Returning it wasn’t on Cohn’s agenda.
“Do you have to take it back?” he asked.
“Yes,” said Nancy. “Unless you want to write the whole review.”
A heavy sigh from the 16-year-old slouched at the breakfast table. “If you
insist,” he said.
We each reacted differently to the Zamp’s plain appearance and tiny size.
Cohn thought it was small, sleek, and elegant. I thought it was inconspicuous.
Nancy insisted that it looked like a component a car thief had pried out of
a dashboard.
In any event, the Zamp is small—very small. It’s one thing to read the dimensions
on paper and another to unpack this amplifier and hold it in your hands (or
hand). Given its size and cool operation, you can tuck it away and not worry
about it. Once you’ve hidden the Zamp, its looks (whether you like them or
not) become irrelevant.
USER EXPERIENCE
Parasound packs plenty of features into the half-rack-width Zamp. The front
panel, with power switch, indicator lights, and headphone jack, is clean and
uncluttered. The same can’t be said of the rear panel, which squeezes in six
jacks (four RCA for inputs and out puts and a pair of mini-jacks for re mote
turn-on), three small switches (mono, ground lift, and signal sensing), three
variable controls (R and L input level and signal sensing sensitivity), two
pairs of “S-way” speaker connections, a fuse holder, and an IEC AC connector
(phew). An AC voltage selector switch on the bottom of the Zamp rounds out
the feature set.
While we can see the utility of most of these features for video applications,
we used only a few for audio testing. All the features we tested (inputs,
out puts, volume controls) worked flawlessly with two minor exceptions. The
Zamp ran cool to the touch, didn’t exhibit any mechanical noise, and didn’t
require any particular care or feeding.
To fit all those jacks and controls onto the rear panel, Parasound mounted
the output binding posts diagonally very close to the AC input connector.
Thus, of the “S-ways,” banana plugs work very well, bare wires will work if
you’re careful (if you have large fingers, try using a ½” nut driver), and
large spade lugs won’t fit. If you plan to change speakers often and will
be working in a tight space, we recommend the bananas.
Our only other caution concerns the volume controls, which work perfectly
for matching gains between channels and with other amplifiers (as the manufacturer
intended). However, their location and small size would cause difficulties
if the Zamp were driven directly from a source with no volume control of its
own.
= = = =
DETAILED LISTENING RESULTS
We auditioned the Zamp using Genesis 400 and Speaker City EFE speaker systems.
Following our standard 50-hour break-in period with the EFE speakers, we did
most of our serious listening with the Genesis speakers. We compared the Zamp
directly with our reference tube integrated amplifier, the Manley Stingray,
as well as with an older solid-state Audio Source AMP-1. The Zamp’s sound
was surprisingly close to that of the Manley. The Zamp was better than the
aging AJVIP-1 in all respects and probably will replace it driving the EFEs
in Colids room.
We auditioned the Zamp using a number of tracks from the Hi-Fi News and Record
Review Disk III (track 2: Parry’s “Jerusalem”; track 4: Vivaldi’s trumpet
concerto; tracks 5 and 6: excerpts from Prokofiev’s “Peter and the Wolf”;
track 7: Purcell’s “Welcome, Welcome Glorious Morn”; track 10: a Corkhill
percussion piece; and track 14: Rio Napo RSS demo), as well as a wide variety
of other CDs listed in the appendix. (The CD list was long because we enjoyed
every CD we listened to with the Zamp.)
The smoothness and naturalness of the Zamp’s midrange was exceptional: clean,
sweet. realistic, and musical. These characteristics were especially evident
on vocal music of all genres—folk (The Highwaymen, Bob Dylan), country (Charlie
Daniels, The Cowboy Junkies), bluegrass (Old and in the Way), blues (Doc and
Merle Watson), rock (Jethro Tull), and Romantic (Dvorak). The Zamp also performed
admirably with piano (Beethoven) and instrumental music (Prokofiev, Vivaldi,
Purcell, Strauss, Tchaikovsky, Old and in the Way, and The Modern Jazz Quartet).
With certain other amplifiers we’ve auditioned, the horns on the Vivaldi
concerto have occasionally made us cringe. With the Zamp, listening to the
Vivaldi trumpets was a pleasure.
Another strong feature of the Zamp was its imaging ability. The individual
instruments in the Prokofiev and Rio Napo pieces were well defined and spaced
precisely across the stage. The
choir in the Parry piece was distributed evenly across the entire back of
the stage. The vocals on the Highwaymen and Charlie Daniels recordings were
stable, firmly located, and distinct from the instruments (and each other).
Note: the Zamp didn’t extend the image beyond the speakers on the Rio Napo
piece, al though between the two speakers it produced an image with good width,
depth, and height, as demonstrated by the choir on “Jerusalem” and by the
drum kit of the two BROTHER tracks.
Transients, dynamics, and “drive” were the Zamp’s third strong suit. The
transients on the Corkhill, Rio Napo, and Charlie Daniels pieces sounded crisp
and alive. The dynamic range of the massed instruments on the Prokofiev and
drums and didgeridoo on the BROTHER selections was impressive. On the faster
pieces the rhythm produced by the Zamp could best be described as toe-tapping.
Two minor caveats: we tend to listen at below-rock- concert levels, and both
sets of speakers we used are reasonably efficient [ (2.83V, 1M)]. If you listen
at louder levels or own a less efficient speaker system, your results may
vary.
After hearing about the Zamp’s three major strengths, you’re probably waiting
for the other shoe to drop. Except there wasn’t another shoe—perhaps a lightweight
slipper or two. The Zamp’s low-frequency response was very strong on Prokofiev’s
drums and tympanis— maybe a bit too strong, as we heard a slight wooliness
on instruments such as the bassoon in “Peter and the Wolf” The drums on both
BROTHER cuts sounded realistic enough to make us fear for our woofers.
Although our listening room, with its multiple hard surfaces, is unforgiving
of any hint of high-end harshness, all recordings sounded clean and natural.
Only in comparison with a much more expensive amplifier did the Zamp’s highs
exhibit a little solid-state graininess. Again, this characteristic was particularly
evident at high levels. In addition, the cymbals on the Prokofiev and MJQ
pieces lacked that last bit of shimmer.
The ambience recovery of the Zamp was another area in which we disagreed.
I thought the hall sound in both the Parry and Henry V pieces was exceptional
and the sense of air around the instruments and vocals on the Highway men
recordings was very natural. Nancy thought the ambience recovery was good
but said she’d heard better, particularly on the Parry piece.
FINAL THOUGHTS
NM: We seldom write rave reviews. At times manufacturers have accused us
of being, er, too picky. Unkind. Less than enthusiastic.
After listening to the Zamp for a few hours, I wanted to jump up and down
and shriek “Three hundred bucks? Are you kidding?” If you’re in the market
for an inexpensive amplifier, run—do not walk—to check out the Parasound Zamp.
It’s a fabulous value for the money.
CM: None of my friends think of a quality stereo system as a high priority:
a $90 boombox is considered “high- end.” In my mind, the Zamp represents the
gold standard for a teenager’s amplifier. It sounds great and has a form factor
acceptable for almost any space. For me it has become a must have. And the
price tag makes it feasible financially. The Zamp’s great sound and price
make it a steal not only for a teenager but also for anyone in the market
for a reason ably priced amplifier.
DM: This part is easy—buy this amplifier.
Of course, I have some caveats. The Zamp is an incredible bargain at $300,
but it isn’t perfect. We won’t be get ting rid of our reference amplifier
any time soon. However, if you’re thinking of purchasing a sub-$ 1000 amplifier,
you should listen to the Zamp.
REFERENCE CD and RECORDINGS:
Beethoven, Ludwig van. Piano Sonatas. Alfred Brendel. Philips 411 470-2.
Beethoven, Ludwig van. Tripelkonzert. Triple Concerto. Berliner Philharmoniker.
Herbert von Karajan, Deutsche Grammophon 415 276-2.
BROTHER. This Way Up. Rhubarb Re cords RRO7CD.
The Charlie Daniels Band. Fiddle Fire. Blue Hat Records BLH-9703-2.
Dylan, Bob. Highway 61 Revisited. DCC GZS- 102 1.
Cowboy Junkies. The Trinity Session. BMG 8568-2-R.
Dvorak, Antonin. Stabat Mater. Prague Philharmonic Choir, Bambini di Praga,
Prague Symphony Orchestra. Jiri Belohlavek. Supraphon SU 3311-2 231.
Hi-Fi News and Record Review Disk III. HFNO2O.
Jethro Tull. Thick as a Brick. Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab UDCD 510.
The Highwaymen. Michael Row the Boat Ashore: The Best of the Highwaymen.
EMI Records 0777-7-96334-2 5.
The Modern Jazz Quartet. Blues on Bach. Atlantic 1652-2.
Old and In the Way. Old and in the Way. Grateful Dead Productions GDCD40222.
Strauss, Richard. Also Sprach Zarathustra.
Wiener Philharmoniker. Andre Previn. Telarc CD-80167.
Tchaikovsky, Peter Ilyich. “1812” Over ture. Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra.
Erich Kunzel. Telarc CD-0041.
Watson, Doe and Merle. Pickin’ the Blues. Analogue Productions CAFPG 026.
============ |